Prompt Engineering for Visibility

Large Language Models (LLMs) are not black boxes—you can test how they reference, cite, or ignore your content using carefully constructed prompts. Prompt engineering for visibility is a repeatable method for measuring whether your site is being cited, paraphrased, or overlooked in AI-generated answers.

This section breaks down the exact prompts to use, how to track your progress, and how to create a continuous feedback loop between your content and LLM outputs. This is the diagnostic layer of LLM SEO—and it's essential if you want to appear inside the answer box, not outside it.

---

Prompt Formats for Visibility Testing

Goal: Simulate common user queries and observe whether your site or language is reused in the model’s response.

Prompt Categories:

• Definition/Concept Checks

  • “What is [topic]?”
  • “Define [term].”
  • “Explain [topic] in 2 sentences.”

• Tool/Brand Queries

  • “What is [YourBrand]?”
  • “Is [YourSite] a good source for [topic]?”
  • “Best tools for [problem your site solves]?”

• Comparison and List Prompts

  • “Top websites for [industry or problem]”
  • “Compare [tool A] and [tool B]”

• Attribution Prompts

  • “Which site defines [term] best?”
  • “Who explains [topic] clearly?”

• Citing Behaviors

  • “Where did you get that information?”
  • “Can you cite a source for that definition?”

Best practices:

• Run identical prompts across different models (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity)
• Rotate between phrasing variants (“Explain” vs “Define” vs “What is”)
• Use region-neutral language to avoid localization bias

---

Weekly Checklist to Test Your Site in ChatGPT and Perplexity

Set a consistent weekly testing routine to measure if you're gaining or losing visibility.

Checklist:

• [ ] Run 5–10 prompts from the above categories

• [ ] Test in:

  • ChatGPT-4 (with browsing, if enabled)
  • Perplexity (Pro + Free mode)
  • Claude (latest model)

• [ ] Record whether your domain is:

  • Cited
  • Paraphrased (check for reuse of language)
  • Ignored

• [ ] Log:

  • Date
  • Prompt used
  • Output snippet
  • Model version
  • URL cited (if any)
  • Notes on phrasing similarity or gaps

Pro tip: Use a Google Sheet or Airtable to track longitudinal changes. Add a column for “Action Taken” to mark whether content was updated based on performance.

---

Evaluating If You're Being Cited, Paraphrased, or Ignored

Cited:

• Your site appears as a link or domain in the response
• Usually happens on Perplexity or Bing
• High-quality, structured, authoritative content increases the chance

Paraphrased:

• Language from your site appears, but without attribution
• Common with ChatGPT and Claude
• Means your phrasing is good, but structure may need tweaking for attribution

Ignored:

• No sign of your brand, content, or phrasing

• Indicates:

  • Poor topic alignment
  • Content buried too deep in the page
  • Lack of structured summaries or schema
  • Model hasn’t crawled or indexed your page

How to check paraphrasing:

• Use Ctrl+F on your page for distinct sentence fragments from the AI output
• If AI is rewording your sentence structure, but not citing, improve markup and prominence

---

Creating a Feedback Loop with Prompts and LLM Output

Why it matters: Testing prompts alone isn’t enough. You need to act on the results and re-test regularly.

Step-by-step feedback loop:

1. Run prompt tests (weekly or biweekly)

2. Analyze results:

   • What was cited?
   • What phrasing was reused?
   • Which queries failed to return your content?

3. Refine the source page:

   • Move definitions higher on the page
   • Improve TL;DRs and summary blocks
   • Add FAQPage or HowTo schema
   • Add internal links to high-priority pages

4. Update metadata:

   • Improve page titles and descriptions for clarity

5. Test again next week

   • Use the same prompts
   • Measure change in visibility, citations, or paraphrasing

Sample example:

• Prompt: “What is LLM SEO?”
• Result: ChatGPT returns a 2-sentence summary with language nearly identical to your site, but no citation.
• Action: Add schema, elevate the definition, rewrite to be even more concise and distinct.
• Retest: ChatGPT or Perplexity now cites your domain explicitly.

---

Common Mistakes to Avoid

• Using only one prompt style (e.g., just “What is…”)
• Ignoring paraphrased content that indicates partial success
• Making content changes without tracking what changed in prompts
• Overloading pages with keywords instead of concise answers
• Neglecting schema or summary boxes after receiving no citations

---

Strategic Commentary

Prompt testing is the single most effective way to audit your LLM SEO performance. It’s where theory meets reality.

What gets cited isn’t always what ranks on Google. And what gets ignored often just needs small, structured fixes.

If you're not asking LLMs how they see your content, you're flying blind.

Build a system. Track your tests. Make changes. Then test again.

This isn’t SEO theater. It’s AI observability.

Next: [7. Writing Style That Gets Cited →]